Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2020-05-19 05:05 pm
Entry tags:

☆ZRAEL

[ Everything fades to black...and you awaken in a gold mine.

You're wearing guard uniforms, and a newspaper informs you that you are currently in %COUNTRYNAME% in the year %CONTEMPORARY%+1. The newspaper is otherwise actually fairly unhelpful, aside from something detailing the results of a recent attempt at revolt in a city in %COUNTRYNAME%: worker’s success at managing a nearby gold mine led to dreams of every man being a king - the revolutionaries may have been successful had it not been for a concurrent jailbreak and mass slaughter putting local authorities on alert, buying time for military intervention - the town was nearly leveled to the ground, with few survivors.

But you seem to remember - you survived, didn’t you?

...Also, below the main headline about the failed revolution, there's something about Those Who Crave Hands? Huh.

Anyways, you've got marketing to do! ]
regale: (103)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] regale 2020-05-20 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
...I see!
hissterics: malagraphic (97)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] hissterics 2020-05-20 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
[ Reads the rules

Looks around

. . .

Nerd's not here. ]



--Seriously?! We're dead.
regale: (b)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] regale 2020-05-20 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
Kitty. Don't be so negative already.
avestan: it really starts screamin' (Once it gets to 32%)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] avestan 2020-05-20 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, this is gonna suck.
constellationprize: (949)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] constellationprize 2020-05-20 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Um...
rollplayinghouse: (ca142)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] rollplayinghouse 2020-05-20 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
They're really into making us vote each other out without actually knowing what we're doing, lately, huh?
rollplayinghouse: (sa005)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] rollplayinghouse 2020-05-20 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know... we did win the dating game. We could write profiles like that...
carnivorouscarnival: (d08)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] carnivorouscarnival 2020-05-20 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
... So we just downvote everyone else.

That's the strategy here, right?
hissterics: malagraphic (145)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] hissterics 2020-05-20 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe you should stop being so positive already.
Edited 2020-05-20 00:23 (UTC)
hissterics: (26)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] hissterics 2020-05-20 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
--The what game?
avestan: for rats before. (I guess I've never really blamed God)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] avestan 2020-05-20 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Sounds good to me.
hissterics: (05)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] hissterics 2020-05-20 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Obviously. That's what makes the most sense, anyway.
rollplayinghouse: (sa028)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] rollplayinghouse 2020-05-20 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
The game they talk about in the rules. We had to write profiles and then decide which ones we liked without knowing who they were, and if two people liked each other they went on a date.
regale: (7)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] regale 2020-05-20 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
Hmmm...

I don't think so. We won't win if we give up already.
regale: (Clipboard26)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] regale 2020-05-20 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
And to vote for the really good ones!
carnivorouscarnival: (d30)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] carnivorouscarnival 2020-05-20 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
Great, easy. So the only part left to decide is who to send out.
rollplayinghouse: (hg12)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] rollplayinghouse 2020-05-20 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
And not upvote anyone? That just lets the audience pick instead of us, right? We should at least spend what we have...

And how many people should we put up to model...?
carnivorouscarnival: (d16)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] carnivorouscarnival 2020-05-20 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
Done and done.

Page 1 of 8