Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2018-09-22 03:27 pm
Entry tags:

POISON GAME: sensitIV

[ The room is plain, white walls and white ceiling, except for the steel-panel flooring. There are three metal stands rising out of openings in the floor, each of which carries a glass vial on top. One of them just holds water. Of the remaining two, one contains a pale pink, opaque liquid with a creamy consistency; the next is tinged barely yellow like a weak tea, and would be almost completely transparent but for the pulp and fibers mixed in, drifting through it.

Both have flowers floated across the surface: the first a tiny sprinkling of cherry blossom petals; the second a small, but whole, bloomed lotus. They're cute and smell nice. ]
may_fly: (13)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] may_fly 2018-09-22 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)

Yes. The lives on this unit are worth more than those off of it.

sancrimony: (πŸ•† 047)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-22 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
. . . . I don't know about any life being worth more or less than any other life.

. . . But, I certainly . . . certainly don't want to see you or anyone here hurt.
may_fly: (04)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] may_fly 2018-09-23 12:00 am (UTC)(link)

Then by what measure is your decision made by?

sancrimony: (πŸ•ˆ 226)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
. . . Mmm.
sancrimony: (πŸ•† 062)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
[ oops 1/2. Opens his eyes ]

Trust, perhaps.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] may_fly 2018-09-23 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
I only know my base function. I believe it’s to be β€˜used’.

[ Gross, but it does feel true. ]
sancrimony: (β™± 006)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
. . . Eh?

[ hm that does feel gross ]

. . . Even so, there isn't anyone to "use" you here . . . I think . . .
may_fly: (13)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] may_fly 2018-09-23 12:21 am (UTC)(link)

[ Then what. . . ]

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
. . . Ghost-san . . . ?

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance 2018-09-23 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
don't tell things made to be used that nobody is going to use them

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 08:34 am (UTC)(link)
It isn't as if I don't understand, but is that really healthy?
artificialinelegance: (to the balcony?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance 2018-09-23 09:10 am (UTC)(link)
why are humans so stupid about this if he wasn't forced to be like this by someone then it's fine don't take away a tool's purpose just make sure they're well taken care of
sancrimony: (πŸ•ˆ 211)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 09:52 am (UTC)(link)
. . . It isn't as if I don't understand.

[ repeating clearly, slowly, as he watches her with a sort of measured control, as if perhaps appraising her or anticipating her. ]

But I, at least, will not engage with it. Moreover, there is no person who commands more authority or worth than another - even kings and queens are only human here, with all else stripped away, and hardly any of us on this unit would find "use" for him in such a mechanical way.

I don't disagree on principle; a tool should be used. A tool should be taken care of. But there is none here that I would call my Master, and there is none that I would say should be as such for any other tool here.

[ carefully drawing his hand out to flip it palm up, near his own face ]

Shall we say otherwise? If that is the case, then our purpose here is plain: we are idols. Shall we not perform, for is that not a valid "use"? However, that does not seem to be the consensus shared among us here, even in this own unit - is that not the case? Is it not the case that we seek out, not "tools" in this unit, but rather, "family"? People who may share in our happiness as well as our sorrow as they like, who may make their own decisions as they like?

Shall I lie, then, and say that there is someone who would use him in such a way? Do you prefer such a cruelty, Ane-ue?
Edited 2018-09-23 09:55 (UTC)
artificialinelegance: (so we can enter the trance)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance 2018-09-23 10:02 am (UTC)(link)
[ almost instantly: ]

I'll use him.
artificialinelegance: (so dizzy so dizzy)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance 2018-09-23 10:07 am (UTC)(link)
Companionship, if nothing else. I been tryna work on his functional personhood since he showed up, anyway.
Edited 2018-09-23 10:07 (UTC)
sancrimony: (πŸ•ˆ 240)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 10:09 am (UTC)(link)
[ shower ]

Is even companionship only something that is on a "use and be used" basis? Even humans are compelled to do that much.

[ there's a pause ]

Ah - actually, what do you mean by companionship?
artificialinelegance: (if i'm a circle)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance 2018-09-23 10:13 am (UTC)(link)
[ shut UP ]

Not sex, if that's what you're thinkin'. I ain't raisin' Me 2.0 here. I mean keepin' me company. Helpin' out with shit he wants to. Eventually we'll find out what his actual purpose is an' I'll focus on that but 'till then there's no reason he can't do the same shit I'm made for.
sancrimony: (☩ 063)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 10:18 am (UTC)(link)
[ tilts his head ]

You know, I don't think that's really being a "tool" insofar as you are not servicing anyone in particular.

[ with a pause ]

Certainly to some extent public service may be considered fulfilling one's purpose as a tool, however is it not true that is also simply the responsible thing for one to do as a person in their living space regardless of whether they are human or tool?

[ and then: ]

Moreover - I don't see how anything I have said contradicts what you have said.
Edited 2018-09-23 10:19 (UTC)
artificialinelegance: (dead songs of unwilling servants)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance 2018-09-23 10:28 am (UTC)(link)
Uh, I service multiple people in particular? Hiryuu, Intensity, Yasuragi, you shitheads even if you're dumb about lettin' me do it...

There's a difference between public service as a virtue and public service as a purpose.
sancrimony: (πŸ•ˆ 223)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 10:35 am (UTC)(link)
[ slowly



blinks ]

What would that difference be?
artificialinelegance: (tried to apply first aid)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance 2018-09-23 10:53 am (UTC)(link)
[ I can't believe I was arguing with you like a human instead of a slightly less baby than ghost tool. anubis' advice always eludes me. ]

Humans who ain't been made to serve do things because it's the right thing or beneficial or because they're bored. Life's purpose is whatever the fuck they make it out t'be. Or nothin', if they don't find one. To them, personhood's about more than just havin' a sense of self an' bein' able to make decisions on your own, it's about freedom. Individuality. A good robot wants to be a person so it can do its job better and avoid bein' used improperly by idiots an' bad people. A good human wants to be a person because anything else is degrading and unhealthy and stiflin'. And for them, that's true. Servitude's somethin' they gotta be trained into.

So public service, and also everything else, is somethin' a human does because they want to, regardless of why. They do it for themselves. For the rest of us, it's somethin' we do it because someone else needs it. We don't mind it, because there's no point in existin' otherwise. A human can exist without someone t'do shit for. Things made for a purpose can't and don't, even if they can repurpose themselves.

...Sorry I snapped at you. I just knee jerk when I hear that shit. Humans're way too fond of makin' things to be used an' then gettin' soooooo concerned when they want to be used.
sancrimony: (πŸ•ˆ 224)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2018-09-23 11:10 am (UTC)(link)
[ just kind of blinks a few times as she goes on like he almost wants to argue but he's not sure what he's supposed to be arguing here. ]

. . . I don't mind, it seems there was simply a misunderstanding here. . .

[ a pause ]

If you . . . do not care . . . for either of those, then does that make you "bad" . . . ?

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-23 11:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-23 11:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-23 11:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-23 11:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-23 12:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-23 12:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-26 22:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-27 10:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-27 21:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-27 21:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-27 21:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 03:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 06:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 06:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 06:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 06:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 06:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 06:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 06:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 06:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 06:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 06:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 07:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 07:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 07:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 07:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 07:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 07:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 08:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 08:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 08:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 08:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-09-28 08:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2018-09-28 08:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] artificialinelegance - 2018-10-04 01:08 (UTC) - Expand