Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2020-05-19 04:54 pm
Entry tags:

sensitIV

[ Everything fades to black...and you awaken in a run-down one-room shack

You're wearing raggedy/a regular/fancy versions of your uniform/servant uniforms, and a newspaper informs you that you are currently in %COUNTRYNAME%, in the year %CONTEMPORARY%+1. The newspaper is otherwise actually fairly unhelpful, aside from something detailing the results of a recent attempt at revolt in a city in %COUNTRYNAME%: worker’s success at managing a nearby gold mine led to dreams of every man being a king - the revolutionaries may have been successful had it not been for a concurrent jailbreak and mass slaughter putting local authorities on alert, buying time for military intervention - the town was nearly levelled to the ground, with few survivors.

...Also, below the main headline about the failed revolution, there's something about Those Who Crave Hands? Huh. Don't you remember something about that, actually?

Anyways, you've got marketing to do! ]
sancrimony: (πŸ•† 049)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2020-05-20 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
[ so much for my clothes.

re-healing himself every time new cuts open exclusively because he is already dizzy from the blood loss and he doesn't need any more dizziness ]

. . .

Now . . . what.
forgottenmercy: (and it's an evensong)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forgottenmercy 2020-05-20 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
Now we know how they're playing. [gentle. with an edge.]
sancrimony: (πŸ•ˆ 208)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2020-05-20 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
. . . So we play by their rules, then?
forgottenmercy: (and it's an evensong)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forgottenmercy 2020-05-20 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
It seems they were happy enough to take advantage of our gentleness. [staring at that -24.]
sancrimony: (πŸ•† 047)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2020-05-20 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
Mmm.

[ faintly, a bit. ]

However you like, then.
forgottenmercy: (Default)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forgottenmercy 2020-05-20 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
Would you prefer mercy for them?
sancrimony: (πŸ•† 045)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2020-05-20 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
I would prefer whatever the unit would prefer.
forgottenmercy: (Default)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forgottenmercy 2020-05-20 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
I think we are split on that.
crystallinelore: (behind the water slide)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] crystallinelore 2020-05-20 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
[reaching... to help...]

We downvote.
sancrimony: (πŸ•ˆ 240)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2020-05-20 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
[ IIIIII DDDDDOOONNNN''''TTTT WAAAAAAANNTTTT TTTTOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

he does not say anything, however, and just tips his head ]

Thank you.
crystallinelore: (of pulling heaven down)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] crystallinelore 2020-05-20 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
You can say. If you do not wish to. I am angry, but I will not ignore your desires.
sancrimony: (☩ 083)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2020-05-20 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
[ with a shake of his head ]

. . . I am not fond of making martyrs of ourselves.
crystallinelore: (and down the hill)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] crystallinelore 2020-05-20 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
...All right.
backstory: (Difficult pill to swallow)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] backstory 2020-05-20 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
If we play by their rules, we are punishing the other units who are in the same boat as us.

. . . Do we have a chance of recovering after this? With our current score?
sancrimony: (β™± 023)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2020-05-20 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
. . . I doubt we'd be able to win.
backstory: (Just the way things are)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] backstory 2020-05-20 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
Then my next question is-- is it better to take more hits?

I do not want to see you and or anyone else here hurt more. But I do not want to punish the other units who have played kindly, further.
sancrimony: (πŸ•ˆ 208)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2020-05-20 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
. . .

Then, what do you want to do?
backstory: Do not take (Wear it with pride)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] backstory 2020-05-20 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
. . . I am angry.

But neither do I want to downvote.

[ Still making the attempt to recover. He has Dante's jacket now though, for some decency. ]