Murder Mysterium - pep!pep!

[idolpro]

[ Your unit-colored alcove has its own seating—benches, rather than any specific number of chairs, line the green bushels. It's wide enough to comfortably fit all of your unitmates if necessary, though it's likely not all of you will be here at a time. You're aware, somehow, that the space is soundproof; you could say whatever you like here and it won't be heard by anyone but your unitmates.

At the center of your "room" is what looks to be a marble table, but upon further inspection you'll note that the surface is actually electronic, a touch screen that mimics the visual texture of marble. Here, you have a number of options of things to choose from, and you can even pull up a keyboard or write with your finger for a certain freeform answer section. ]

Comments

DISCUSSION

[idolpro]

Re: DISCUSSION

[worldlyafflictions]

Soooo, plans? I was fishin' for some non-violent types we could work with.

Re: DISCUSSION

[quickpersuader]

Do you think we can trust in them to come unarmed? There were a few units with injuries, so that makes me think they must have coordinated weapons when they met up. It's grim, but it could give us a better defense in case another unit tries to barge in, as well as a sure alibi even if we do injure each other a little.

Re: DISCUSSION

[worldlyafflictions]

I guess coordinating a weapon's technically the safest but I keep getting distracted wondering if there's a more interesting way ta do things...

Like. If we get a group of five or six and someone does manage ta explode us, if we get that unit out in the voting round does that mean all of us win? Is that a way ta get as many winners as possible? Do we get exploded in the end still? If someone does come in with a weapon, do we get split up somehow so we don't know someone is missing? In that case at least when questioning the victim there's easy ways ta group the suspects...

I've really started ta develop a weird habit!

Re: DISCUSSION

[quickpersuader]

...You're getting really into this, aren't you? Or... maybe you're just interested in breaking apart the game?

Re: DISCUSSION

[worldlyafflictions]

Picking each other off slowly while feeling all paranoid and suspicious is a pain! THIS GAME COULDA BEEN FUN!! Doesn't that make ya wanna act out a little!?

Re: DISCUSSION

[quickpersuader]

Do you really want to see if we can get that many units to agree to possibly die in one go?

[Not really chiding, as usual, they're genuinely curious, if thoughtful.]

Re: DISCUSSION

[worldlyafflictions]

I feel like I could do it... Maybe for a round or two.

We could claim like three rooms or something publicly and then privately decide which of the three ta meet in ta make it a little less risky, and overall that still means people who aren't tryin' ta kill anybody (yet) have more space ta spread out 'n not accidentally get on top of each other...

Re: DISCUSSION

[quickpersuader]

I don't mind trying it, but I don't know very many people off-unit. It might be up to you to actually convince them...

Do you think you could do that?

Re: DISCUSSION

[worldlyafflictions]

If I target some of the teams that're already paired up. Well, this is probably the best time ta try it anyway, before the game really starts ta force our hands on stuff.


If it really goes south though there's gonna be pain at the end. The options here aren't the most creative ones they've ever thrown at us but dying is still always worse than ya think it'll be.

Re: DISCUSSION

[nutsandrevolts]

. . .




. . .









I don't get it.

Re: DISCUSSION

[worldlyafflictions]

Well it's fine it's fine, I'll work it out!