"Mm... I wonder if that's true. Although you do say a lot of words. I don't think there's anything wrong with that, though."
The black ink, incidentally, looks like a distinctly different writer than the red ink—the handwriting is similar, but not exactly the same, and the tone is very different.
This beast devoured a small human girl about your age from the inside so it could wear her shape and trick others into thinking it's a human, too. In a cruel twist of Fate, this place has trapped it in this shape except under very specific circumstances.
Perhaps you'll have the chance to see before I finish this assignment. For now, I have to stay clearheaded. Our rather annoying defacer of literature is being even more irksome this time around.
You said there are no circumstances where you'd think there was nothing you could do for love, but there are plenty of things you wouldn't, you proud bastard. She'd give you everything, and you could say she did, and what did you do for her, really?
Without even quite giving it any thought this beast can already supply "saved her life" and "bore the guilt of giving her something she desperately wanted", but I think everyone here is aware this isn't really about that. This beast does not particularly care to questions posed in bad faith, so all that really needs to be said is that no relationship (whether it is one of friendship, romance, or tutelage) demands exact equivalence; only that all parties involved give what they have agreed to give while allowing for all other parties to end the relationship with no issue if they so desire.
You know, you surround yourself with a whole lot of people who want to put you on a pedestal. Doesn't that make you wonder if you're doing it on purpose?
Ah, yes. The grandest of crimes; desiring to be loved. A ditch will be dug for those who primarily associate with those who enjoy their existence right next to the grave reserved for tyrants.
Sarcasm aside, she clearly does wonder. And with that in mind, if she is not using the pedestal to extort those who placed her there, what does it matter if it is indeed purposeful?
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
The black ink, incidentally, looks like a distinctly different writer than the red ink—the handwriting is similar, but not exactly the same, and the tone is very different.
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
There's a little fear in her eyes, but also, like—the anticipation of "is it cool."
Powers are on, by the way.
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Without even quite giving it any thought this beast can already supply "saved her life" and "bore the guilt of giving her something she desperately wanted", but I think everyone here is aware this isn't really about that. This beast does not particularly care to questions posed in bad faith, so all that really needs to be said is that no relationship (whether it is one of friendship, romance, or tutelage) demands exact equivalence; only that all parties involved give what they have agreed to give while allowing for all other parties to end the relationship with no issue if they so desire.
You know, you surround yourself with a whole lot of people who want to put you on a pedestal. Doesn't that make you wonder if you're doing it on purpose?
Ah, yes. The grandest of crimes; desiring to be loved. A ditch will be dug for those who primarily associate with those who enjoy their existence right next to the grave reserved for tyrants.
Sarcasm aside, she clearly does wonder. And with that in mind, if she is not using the pedestal to extort those who placed her there, what does it matter if it is indeed purposeful?
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Self-loathing has not occurred to her whatsoever.
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Shall we continue on?
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
Re: RETROSPECTIVES, THIRD-PARTY
[ handhold handhold whee ]