Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2022-09-10 01:37 pm

POISON: future is now

[ The room is plain, white walls and white ceiling, except for the steel-panel flooring. There are three metal stands rising out of openings in the floor, each of which carries a glass vial on top. One of them just holds water. Of the remaining two, one contains a dark red, opaque liquid with a creamy consistency; the next is a relaxing blue, with small brightly glittering star-like orbs drifting through it.

Both have fancy but identical cast iron stoppers moulded in the shape of a shark plugging them shut. The only difference is that the red vial's shark is painted white, and the blue vial's shark is painted black. ]
glidinglight: (default)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] glidinglight 2022-09-11 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly. This is a lose-lose situation no matter what choice we make, so I'm trying not to get too invested in what we do either way.

[ small pause ]

That said, I'd prefer BAD END over Heart Soldier, personally. I have a friend there and another friend who'd probably take it very badly if I poisoned his boyfriend.
trainphreaking: (00000001; when i swing left)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] trainphreaking 2022-09-11 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, they're both paired together, so we can't really hit one without the other. There's AlcheME, too, I suppose.
glidinglight: (eeyikes)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] glidinglight 2022-09-11 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
[ whuff. ]

Yyyeah if it's not a problem let's pick AlcheME instead. If they get mad I'll take responsibility.
trainphreaking: (00011000; it wasn't.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] trainphreaking 2022-09-11 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Noted. It seems like that's our other decent choice, anyway. I'll put it to Val.
glidinglight: (default)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] glidinglight 2022-09-11 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
If it's too much of a problem for some reason, we can gamble on HSS and Bad End. Who knows, he might not even be there.
trainphreaking: (00010011; since you were here)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] trainphreaking 2022-09-11 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh. I'm not really sentimental, and Val's main issue with AlcheME was that they're a bit unpredictable and might have anger issues, apparently? Which is sort of a mileage-may-vary problem.
glidinglight: (quelle surprise)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] glidinglight 2022-09-11 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Anger issues? Aren't they the team that dresses up like cute mages and stuff?
trainphreaking: (00010100; or else it hasn't.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] trainphreaking 2022-09-11 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I'm not a people-person. That was Val's impression, not mine.
glidinglight: (ponder)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] glidinglight 2022-09-12 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Interesting. I haven't really had any experience with them myself. I guess we'll see what happens.
trainphreaking: (00010011; since you were here)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] trainphreaking 2022-09-12 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
And, well—no need to throw yourself on a grenade, or anything, if they're notified it was us. I'm used to not getting along with people.
glidinglight: (Default)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] glidinglight 2022-09-12 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
[ Hm. She did mention she's not a people-person. ]

Well, that's a shame. You seem like a reasonable enough person.
trainphreaking: (00101110; and in a pit behind the altar)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] trainphreaking 2022-09-12 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
Pfft—really? There's some people out there who'd be damn well surprised to hear it.
glidinglight: (smile)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] glidinglight 2022-09-12 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
Well, yeah. You took my opinions into consideration even though it's just me here. You could have easily overridden anything I had to say with a vote.
trainphreaking: (00011100; you left behind)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] trainphreaking 2022-09-12 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
Eh. I... guess.