Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2019-02-01 02:57 pm
Entry tags:

War Rooms: pep!pep!

[This room might be a nice, slightly whimsical surrounds to talk things over in, if it weren't for the collars and countdowns on your phones. ]
sleeplessknight: (124)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
[idly touching the collar with her fingertips]

Ah...
puzzlers: (pic#11981207)

[personal profile] puzzlers 2019-02-02 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
This is certainly new... [ maybe. ]
sleeplessknight: (37)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
We had a similar game before, though... in that one, we had a choice to protect ourselves as well.
puzzlers: DNT. (pic#11990626)

[personal profile] puzzlers 2019-02-02 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
I guess they decided to change up the rules so our own unit is always protected. [ how generous. ]

[ he is really thankful for that though, because seeing any harm come to his unit is the last thing he wants right now. ]

What are your thoughts about who we should protect?
worldlyafflictions: (ch097pg16p3)

[personal profile] worldlyafflictions 2019-02-02 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
More like.. last time it was the choice between protecting ourselves and hurting someone else, or protecting someone else and risk getting ourselves if nobody protected us.

This time it'll be about whether or not we're at the top of anyone's to-protect list 'n if they win out over someone else's top pick. Great way ta make people feel guilty for surviving, or isolated if they don't.
Edited 2019-02-02 01:37 (UTC)
puzzlers: (pic#11966676)

[personal profile] puzzlers 2019-02-02 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
... [ oh. he's not sure which is worse, though it's not really a contest. ] And we obviously have no way of knowing who each unit is going to choose. [ so even trying to 'play' the game is going to be difficult. ]

Yeah, it seems like even when you win you lose this game. [ but that's a running theme... ] What do you think we should do?
worldlyafflictions: (anime014)

[personal profile] worldlyafflictions 2019-02-02 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
Decide if we think it's worth the headache ta try and balance for units who might be unpopular, or protect somebody important to a unitmate. My personal feelings aren't strong enough that I feel like I gotta weigh in.. I just don't wanna die...
puzzlers: (pic#11981209)

[personal profile] puzzlers 2019-02-02 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
[ a nod as he considers their options. ]

I guess the first thing we should do is see how has someone they'd like to protect and go from there. [ rise had already expressed an interesting in keeping alcheme safe, because of her brother. ]

The penalty for this game is especially harsh. [ he doesn't want to have to die either, so here's to hoping they're on somebody's list. ]
sleeplessknight: (25)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
Well, it's more like nobody can protect themselves this time. We're all depending on each other, which means... more people will suffer for it, probably.

... I feel indebted to future is now because of that same game.
puzzlers: (pic#11952991)

[personal profile] puzzlers 2019-02-02 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
... [ he quickly gives the rules another quick read and she's absolutely right. ]

I guess they saved pep in the last iteration of this game?
sleeplessknight: (140)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, but at the same time, it's likely that other people will try to protect them.

It's a tough choice...
puzzlers: DNT. (pic#12049251)

[personal profile] puzzlers 2019-02-02 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
It... It really is. It's almost like a puzzle. [ who saves who saves who. ]
sleeplessknight: (51)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
It is, but it's not meant to be solvable.

That's why they're making us go through this.
puzzlers: DNT. (pic#11990623)

[personal profile] puzzlers 2019-02-02 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
[ nods. ]

It wouldn't be entertaining otherwise... [ if there was a cut and dry solution. ]

We should probably all pool our respective 'answers' together and go from there.
sleeplessknight: (142)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
[nods]

That sounds like the best choice, for now.
malignstar: (and for that forsake it all)

[personal profile] malignstar 2019-02-02 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
They hoping the last game will mix up opinions?
sleeplessknight: (52)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
It's... at least it's an easier choice.
malignstar: (vogue)

[personal profile] malignstar 2019-02-02 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
If only we could rely on everyone picking a different team. Then we could protect everyone.
sleeplessknight: (54)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah... but that didn't work before, so...
malignstar: (hell's angels)

[personal profile] malignstar 2019-02-02 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
I know... But we should still try for a unit less likely to get picked.
sleeplessknight: (51)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if we can do that, Sunshine.
malignstar: (vogue)

[personal profile] malignstar 2019-02-02 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
Well, we know the least popular units. We just work our way back based on our knowledge of their connections.
sleeplessknight: (52)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
... By that logic, we should try to protect Wild City again...

[but they also wanted to bus us during the trial game.....]
malignstar: (who are unable to resist)

[personal profile] malignstar 2019-02-02 02:19 am (UTC)(link)
Silver isn't unpopular... There's also the punks and heroes. People tend to assume everyone else will protect them.
sleeplessknight: (51)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight 2019-02-02 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
[quiet for a moment]

I think... this time, I'd rather just protect who we want to protect.

(no subject)

[personal profile] malignstar - 2019-02-02 02:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] sleeplessknight - 2019-02-02 03:00 (UTC) - Expand