In my opinion, the ones who cannot possibly bear to die should be voted for. In that case, we can take advantage of the secondary win criteria: one may lie in order to protect themselves.
Provided there is some form of overlap, they will most assuredly be safe. Then, I suppose, they can choose who they will save.
no subject
Provided there is some form of overlap, they will most assuredly be safe. Then, I suppose, they can choose who they will save.
[ hum ]
That might be the best way to do things.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
. . . If someone says that their information is a location, then we can say that ours is a murder weapon. "A sword" is fine, I think.
If it's someone else, it isn't relevant.
no subject
Keep me updated on whatever you hear. We can always meet back in here to discuss what we've learned and heard in a short while once more.
no subject
. . . Sorry, nevermind - it would be better not to say anything after all. In the end, I don't want people to stop believing in you if you lie. . .
no subject
no subject
I can type
i didn't even notice
no subject
And for better or worse, regarding the game, I'd like people to believe me, even if they don't like my decisions here today.