idolpro | Taisho Roman Revolution

Skip to Main Content

Entry tags:

!games,
nafunai

Taisho Roman Revolution

[ Everything fades to black...and you awaken in an opera house.

You're wearing servant uniforms, and a newspaper informs you that you are currently in %COUNTRYNAME% in the year %CONTEMPORARY%+1. The newspaper is otherwise actually fairly unhelpful, aside from something detailing the results of a recent attempt at revolt in a city in %COUNTRYNAME%: worker’s success at managing a nearby gold mine led to dreams of every man being a king - the revolutionaries may have been successful had it not been for a concurrent jailbreak and mass slaughter putting local authorities on alert, buying time for military intervention - the town was nearly levelled to the ground, with few survivors.

But you seem to remember - you survived, didn’t you?

...Also, below the main headline about the failed revolution, there's something about Those Who Crave Hands? Huh.

Anyways, you've got marketing to do! ]

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

There isn't much to discuss this time, is there? No point in changing tactics.

It seems like it's working out, huh? So it's just writing the ads again now.

There isn't really any way to tell, but Valour seems to think Baritones is the only other unit that might try it, and they may very well win the votes at this rate, allowing us to default as winners of the total downvotes, if so. But that's quite a lot of assumption.

BARiTONES is definitely most likely going that route.

. . .

My heart is pounding looking at Pep's score though.

...Yeah.

[he's looking at avante's too. it's not great.]

They could still pull through just fine, there's more rounds to go.

[ a nod to that. ]

We just have to hope.

While a few sound rather earnest, most are nonsense that wouldn't point to anyone. So they have to be expecting it themselves.

Maybe you should work out some sort of code with her for future use.

We'll talk to her after. It's the only thing we can do.

[ Sighs... ]

I hate tames. I'm just glad that the rest of you are alright still, though.

I'm sure we can work something out with her.

[ How about her being absent in the first place. ]

So long as the downvotes keep helping us get through, we might make it out without any punishments. Middle of the pack is just fine.

[haha good luck with getting her excluded]

Speaking of, I...need to discuss something with you all about our pre-existing grievances. Later, maybe.

Middle of the pack is probably the best position to be in. Though the losing units may try and play a little harder this next round.

[She's sure]

Is this about Avante? BARiTONES?

...Avante.

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 04:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-20 04:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

time5kip - 2020-05-20 04:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 04:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-20 04:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 04:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-20 04:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 06:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-20 06:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 10:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 11:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 19:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-21 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-21 00:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-21 08:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-21 17:30 (UTC) - Expand

1/2

sunflowering - 2020-05-21 18:21 (UTC) - Expand

2/2

sunflowering - 2020-05-21 18:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 2/2

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-21 22:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 2/2

firststone - 2020-05-21 23:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 2/2

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-22 07:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 2/2

firststone - 2020-05-22 08:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 04:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 04:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 05:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 05:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 05:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 05:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 05:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 05:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 05:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 06:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 06:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 06:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 09:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 10:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 10:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 10:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 10:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 10:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 10:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 07:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 09:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 11:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

sunflowering - 2020-05-20 19:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-21 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 07:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

bloodyrose - 2020-05-20 07:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 10:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-20 04:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 05:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-20 05:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 05:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-20 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 05:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-20 05:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 05:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

auguryofinnocence - 2020-05-20 06:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

firststone - 2020-05-20 07:33 (UTC) - Expand

Well, it's not like we need to get first place. This amount of effort seems like it's working out fine for us.

. . . Right.

[ She feels awful about downvoting people though. OTL ]

Right. We can only keep it up and wait to see.

How about our votes? We should have three this time. Are we obeying the requested rules again?

I think we ought to. I'm not particularly thrilled about downvoting everyone... especially when we look at the units most affected. But I'd like to at least... give someone some upvotes.

Might as well. This time they added something about voting from the top of bottom depending, too...

Let's just do what we can while trying to survive.

I have to keep reminding myself that no matter what, there were going to be winning units and losing units.

Agreed. At this point that's probably for the best this time. We'll do what we have to to get by.

[ Then to her, he just settles a hand upon her shoulder. ]

Sounds good to me.

. . . This is rather painful.

Pep's situation, or our voting decisions...?

Both.

Realistically I know that there was always going to be losing units. I just... I hate this.

Better them than us.

... Not regarding pep, just, in general.

If we are doing alright in our next round, do you think it is possible to not... mass downvote everyone?

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only