Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2021-06-26 08:38 am

SENSITIV

You and your team find yourself chilling inside of an elevator!



There aren't chairs or anything to sit on, sorry about that. I mean, it's an elevator okay, not a fancy restaurant, geez.

However, enjoy the elevator music. Sometimes it gets interrupted by another song (OOC: but really, that's for my own satisfaction so you can choose to ignore it..
proceedwithcautus: (this is a gift)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2021-06-26 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
...ah, true.

Then—let's pick seven, since... if death is a surmountable obstacle, then if we can mitigate the rest, that's ideal.
sancrimony: (☨ 115)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-06-26 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Mmm.

. . . You are aware of our role as well, yes? As the healers of this place.
proceedwithcautus: (so shiny and new)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2021-06-26 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)
...yes, some of the others explained—I think mostly Mx. Persephone. That, after this kind of game, it falls to us to ensure the health of everyone, since it won't be restored entirely.

In that case—is it prudent to try and survive?
sancrimony: (🕈 240)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-06-26 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
. . . We are granted the unique privilege of the duty to heal those around us, while ensuring our own survival—while at the same time minimizing the harm that we do in the first place.

[ "privilege" ]

Such is the expectation placed on us.

[ with a pause ]

Should we fail to ensure our own survival, the duty of healing those around us falls to those who did not attend the game.

[ there's another pause, a hum ]

So, the question is this: do we owe more to the other units, that burdening our unitmates is more acceptable, or do we owe more to our unitmates, that harming the other units and creating more work for all of us is more acceptable?
proceedwithcautus: (of a dying star.)

1/2

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2021-06-26 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
...
proceedwithcautus: (who could be so cold?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2021-06-26 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
In that case, if you put it that way—

—as healers, if we cannot ensure the survival of the many by some means, then if we can avoid burdening those who stand beside us, then—that's our responsibility, as that's the outcome we can control the most. That's true.

Then, as such—ah, I think... with you having put that forward as a point for consideration...

...in that case, perhaps it should be as many as we can vote for.
sancrimony: (🕆 045)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-06-26 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)
You're prepared for the results, then?
proceedwithcautus: (try to think of ways to fix myself)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2021-06-26 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know. But one way or another, they'll happen anyway, so I'll do my best.
sancrimony: (☦ 092)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-06-26 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Ahaha.

[ reaching over to pat her head, once ]

That's the only thing we can do.

Do you have our healing abilities?
proceedwithcautus: (ready for the ship to list)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2021-06-26 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
[ wah ]

Not yet. Which, admittedly, factors into not wanting to overburden our fellows...

I don't have the points yet. But if it's needed, I'll promise to repay any assistance I might need to be an extra pair of hands.
sancrimony: (☨ 104)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-06-26 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah—we have points for you to spend to buy them, if you like. Do you know about our healing fees?
proceedwithcautus: (the culmination of man's mistakes)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2021-06-26 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, no—I don't think that came up...?
sancrimony: (☨ 113)

1/2

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-06-26 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
[ gonna show her the apoloy jar acct in the points bank app. she's probably auto-added to it but he's adding her if not ]

Here—you can spend these points if you need to. It's a 300 point flat fee for healing, regardless of amount—this is the money we'll use if we need to get any additional medical supplies for our patients, as well.
sancrimony: (☨ 104)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-06-26 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
[ a beat, and he winks ]

. . . Though, you don't need to be strict with this. There are those who would be guarded against us, expecting that we'll hold their treatment over their heads as favors, and those who feel indebted to us regardless.

By having a healing fee, we can say, "Our healing services are neutral transactions, free from any biases." It creates a more balanced relationship, but—it is by no means required.

Ah, that's an industry secret, though, so don't tell anyone.
proceedwithcautus: (we raise it up)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2021-06-26 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, that's good thinking... it makes sense, for people's comfort.

And don't worry, I'll take the trade secrets very seriously!
sancrimony: (🕈 227)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-06-26 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
[ good girls get headpats ]

Very good—then, please feel free to take advantage of the communal funds. I'm looking forward to working with you, Eirene-san.
proceedwithcautus: (but will it ever be enough?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2021-06-26 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)
[ there are so many headpats today for this good girl ]

Ah, I look forward to working with you too, sir!