HEART SOLDIER SENSHI

[idolpro]

You and your team find yourself chilling inside of an elevator!



There aren't chairs or anything to sit on, sorry about that. I mean, it's an elevator okay, not a fancy restaurant, geez.

However, enjoy the elevator music. Sometimes it gets interrupted by another song (OOC: but really, that's for my own satisfaction so you can choose to ignore it..

Comments

DISCUSSION

[idolpro]

[leaveofabsence]

I suppose we should start with does anyone see something or someone that they would rather avoid.

[420blazeit]

...this is... hard. Just, like, one wrong and thing and we're opting to damn somebody.

[leaveofabsence]

Especially since most of these are probably taken out of context for dramatic effect.

[420blazeit]

Of course. I'm sure I've killed a number of innocent people during the omnic invasions, like, if people couldn't get out on time and if a building collapsed due to all the fighting. We have to be careful... or, like, as careful as we can be given the circumstances.

Re: DISCUSSION

[scattershot]

Ah, moral equivalency and a complete lack of context. Exactly what we need to fairly evaluate one another's failings.

[leaveofabsence]

Based on the rules, we should at least choose one to avoid randomized collateral damage.

Though I am undecided whether we should pick seven, given that is over one-third of the sins listed here.

[scattershot]

Agreed. If we have to do this at all, let's at least own our failings. Seven, though...

Seven is a lot.

[leaveofabsence]

Perhaps we could attempt a lower number and see how the first round goes. To see if protection is needed in the later rounds.

I do not wish to see us die, but I also do not wish to use unnecessary force to get to that position.

Re: DISCUSSION

[crossmyheartandhope]

Right? For real.

Re: DISCUSSION

[scattershot]

I don't doubt the Producers could make most things sound unforgivable, if they tried.

Re: DISCUSSION

[crossmyheartandhope]

Pretty much. Stuff like this, it's hard to even know where to start.

And most of this was probly in games, so...

Re: DISCUSSION

[crossmyheartandhope]

This is just as much BS this time as it was last time.

Re: DISCUSSION

[leaveofabsence]

Last time...? Could you elaborate?

Re: DISCUSSION

[crossmyheartandhope]

Same kinda deal. Judging sins, the ones who got judged bit it in nasty ways.

...anyway. What're we doing, here?

Re: DISCUSSION

[leaveofabsence]

You have experience. What do you think we should do?

Re: DISCUSSION

[420blazeit]

Another terrible rerun.

Re: DISCUSSION

[crossmyheartandhope]

Right? Not only are they all awful, they don't got any new ideas, either.

Re: DISCUSSION

[420blazeit]

Just putting us through the same shit... do you, ah, see anything? Like, I definitely think we should pick at least one, like they said.

Re: DISCUSSION

[scattershot]

So it's not even original? Merciful twelve.

Re: DISCUSSION

[420blazeit]

Nope. Seems like they're running out of ideas.

Sometime later (cw: mention of animal abuse)

[leaveofabsence]

So it seems from the options and our own opinions, we have narrowed it down to: the unfortunate dog that was killed, the person who killed for money, and the person who betrayed the love of their life.

Are there any opinions about which we should chose?

Re: Sometime later (cw: mention of animal abuse)

[crossmyheartandhope]

Uh.

I, uh. I maybe know who the second one is.

[leaveofabsence]

Ah. Then we can remove it from the list.

Thank you for speaking up.

[crossmyheartandhope]

Sorry, dude. And, uh - thanks.