Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2021-07-06 06:24 pm

CGID - sensitIV & avante en garde Session 1




You're ushered onto a bridge, huddled around a game board
sancrimony: (☩ 076)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
[ looking over the rules and the trap list, and looking down to the board ]

How interesting . . .
unbr8kable: (thanks I hate it♪)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:02 am (UTC)(link)









...Setting traps, huh? Sounds simple enough.
sancrimony: (☨ 099)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Ah—if you'd like to go ahead, then.
unbr8kable: (welllll)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
...If you got a preference what to do with 'em, feel free to speak up. 'S generally how we do it, anyways.
sancrimony: (☨ 120)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
I see.

[ making like he might send the ball back to her court again for a moment, before moving to point toward this part of the board ]

I think a heavy emphasis on traps here would be good—if we can block them from entering the next room, that will be good for us.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
[Keeps her arms folded, but leans in to peer at the board, curiosity winning out over wariness or posturing for once]

Mm... We get more points if they don't make it to the other goals, right? So, if they come over here to find this one, they'll get stuck in a hole or a horse... Guess that worked well enough in Tokyo-F to stop people.
Edited 2021-07-07 03:18 (UTC)
sancrimony: (☨ 120)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
Preventing others from getting to the goal means we'll have a better chance of winning ourselves, ultimately—though it doesn't affect our chances directly.

What we'll want to do in order to get more points is damage them—well, it isn't really hurting them, but in any case, we'll want to make them spend as many lives as they can.
unbr8kable: (at band camp?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
Killing 'em--uh, video-game-killing 'em shouldn't be that tough. 'Least, so long as the bears and the horse comes through. Just gotta knock 'em into pits enough times I guess.
sancrimony: (🕈 227)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
Would you like to put them down, then?
unbr8kable: (ayyyyy)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
...Sure, whatever. Easy, right?

[is it, though]
sancrimony: (♱ 016)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
Just go for the spots you think they'll certainly walk into.
unbr8kable: (hasta la bye bye)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Duh, of course.

[...frowning at the board. So many possibilities,]

They can see the objectives or whatever...right? So.
sancrimony: (♱ 038)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
I believe they can see everything except what we put down.
unbr8kable: (fire it up)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
'Kay. So... Lure 'em close, then trap 'em where they can't escape.
sancrimony: (☨ 113)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
That's exactly right.
unbr8kable: (plucky girl detective)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
Like a fish trap. 'Cept hopefully nobody'll eat us at the end.
unbr8kable: (really though)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
What? We ain't all into vore; that can't be that much of a surprise.
sancrimony: (☦ 092)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
Would you like to run through first, or shall I?
unbr8kable: (withstand)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
[Quite obviously mathlady.gif to figure out which is worse (and coming up with no clear winner)]

...Whichever. I can go, if you got a plan...or if you don't trust my directions, either way.
sancrimony: (☨ 099)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, trust isn't an issue for me. If you'd like to direct me, I don't mind it at all.

I would imagine that sentiment isn't shared in the reverse, though?
unbr8kable: (sir puffs)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
...Nah, fire away, do your worst. Faster we find the traps, the faster we can avoid 'em, right?
sancrimony: (☨ 103)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
Certainly, that's true. Though, I'll do my best to have you avoid them regardless.

Then, which do you prefer to do? Run around at ground level, or sit here and look at a map?
unbr8kable: (dot dot dot)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
...I'll do the recon. Too much sitting back and strategizing ain't my thing. Easier to memorize by moving around, anyways.
sancrimony: (☨ 104)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
Then, I'll rely on you~
unbr8kable: (eyebrow raise)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
Pretty sure it's the other way around, but whatever.

...We know we're gonna get pinned a couple places, but let's just hope whoever we're up against blew their trap load at that one choke point.
sancrimony: (☨ 120)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
Indeed, we'll have to hope for the best there.
unbr8kable: (grandiosity)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
Or just be ready for the worst; either way, we'll find out soon enough!
sancrimony: (☨ 109)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
If we set off more traps, we'll know how much Warl they've spent, too. . .

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah... If they went cheap but plentiful, or if they went hard on a couple big hitters... 50 oil vases and a single fire trap...
sancrimony: (☨ 124)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
.......... Dangerous....
unbr8kable: (a GREAT idea)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:30 am (UTC)(link)
Think of the dread as they make their way through, just waiting for the inevitable conclusion...
sancrimony: (🕂 181)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
If that's how it ends up for us, I'll give up after the first run.
unbr8kable: (what's the problem?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:47 am (UTC)(link)
Can you just give up? Like...get a couple exclamation points and just call it?
sancrimony: (☦ 091)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
. . . I don't know. What would they do to force us to keep going?
unbr8kable: (hurm)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
Not let you out, maybe...?
sancrimony: (☩ 070)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
Well . . .

I'll give up after the run, then.
unbr8kable: (hum)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah... Least damage's one of the win conditions. Otherwise you could just do nothing and cruise to the finish line.

Re: TURN-IN

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
RUNNER: Nemesis
PATH: here