Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2021-07-06 06:24 pm

CGID - sensitIV & avante en garde Session 1




You're ushered onto a bridge, huddled around a game board
sancrimony: (☨ 099)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Ah—if you'd like to go ahead, then.
unbr8kable: (welllll)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
...If you got a preference what to do with 'em, feel free to speak up. 'S generally how we do it, anyways.
sancrimony: (☨ 120)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
I see.

[ making like he might send the ball back to her court again for a moment, before moving to point toward this part of the board ]

I think a heavy emphasis on traps here would be good—if we can block them from entering the next room, that will be good for us.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
[Keeps her arms folded, but leans in to peer at the board, curiosity winning out over wariness or posturing for once]

Mm... We get more points if they don't make it to the other goals, right? So, if they come over here to find this one, they'll get stuck in a hole or a horse... Guess that worked well enough in Tokyo-F to stop people.
Edited 2021-07-07 03:18 (UTC)
sancrimony: (☨ 120)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
Preventing others from getting to the goal means we'll have a better chance of winning ourselves, ultimately—though it doesn't affect our chances directly.

What we'll want to do in order to get more points is damage them—well, it isn't really hurting them, but in any case, we'll want to make them spend as many lives as they can.
unbr8kable: (at band camp?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
Killing 'em--uh, video-game-killing 'em shouldn't be that tough. 'Least, so long as the bears and the horse comes through. Just gotta knock 'em into pits enough times I guess.
sancrimony: (🕈 227)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
Would you like to put them down, then?
unbr8kable: (ayyyyy)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
...Sure, whatever. Easy, right?

[is it, though]
sancrimony: (♱ 016)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
Just go for the spots you think they'll certainly walk into.
unbr8kable: (hasta la bye bye)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Duh, of course.

[...frowning at the board. So many possibilities,]

They can see the objectives or whatever...right? So.
sancrimony: (♱ 038)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
I believe they can see everything except what we put down.
unbr8kable: (fire it up)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
'Kay. So... Lure 'em close, then trap 'em where they can't escape.
sancrimony: (☨ 113)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2021-07-07 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
That's exactly right.
unbr8kable: (plucky girl detective)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
Like a fish trap. 'Cept hopefully nobody'll eat us at the end.
unbr8kable: (really though)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unbr8kable 2021-07-07 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
What? We ain't all into vore; that can't be that much of a surprise.