Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2021-10-02 09:39 am

Hunger Games: Session 4

[ You find yourself in your respective unit's zone, with a mini-map on your phone, as well as your objectives:


Kill as many competitors as you can.
Destroy zones by breaking their statues.
Not enough action = We start killing you :)


Underneath the objectives is the number of revivals you have left, as well as whatever miscellaneous details about scoring points—killing a unitmate results in negative points, five units will be healed at most, etc.

The starting horn sounds. Let the games begin. ]
leaveofabsence: ([FA] 37)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] leaveofabsence 2021-10-02 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Considering the rules, it appears they would have us battle each other or the environment.

Neither of which I am too keen on doing, though the latter is the lesser of the two evils.
scattershot: (✶ widdershins)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] scattershot 2021-10-02 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I believe what they're really hoping for is that we do both. Last time--

Well, everyone focussed on destroying the statues at first - oh, and when you do that, the ground gives away. But no blood drawn at all. So they decreed we weren't being interesting enough.
Edited 2021-10-02 15:32 (UTC)
leaveofabsence: <user name="icontime"> ([RI11] Closed during daylight hours)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] leaveofabsence 2021-10-02 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I see. Pardon my forwardness, but I do not believe you care whether or not the producers find us interesting.
Edited 2021-10-02 15:35 (UTC)
scattershot: (✶ the quick way)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] scattershot 2021-10-02 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, absolutely not. Pray excuse me while I shed a few tears for their terrible ratings.
leaveofabsence: ([TBD] 27)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] leaveofabsence 2021-10-02 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
So what strategy do you propose we move forward with?

Personally, I would not like to see this place harmed as it offers us a tactical advantage, but also we will not be able to guard this location if we continue forward.
scattershot: (✶ answers)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] scattershot 2021-10-02 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)
If it's anything like last time, at least half the people here will start rushing from place to place, tearing down statues like it's going out of style. We may not be able to defend this place, and this is definitely not a hill I would choose to die on. As far as I'm concerned, we've 'won' if we all make it out in one piece.
leaveofabsence: ([FA] 121)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] leaveofabsence 2021-10-02 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, that is truly the only winning condition.

Shall we continue on then--- to at least add some points to Heart Soldier's scoreboard?
scattershot: (✶ answer on high)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] scattershot 2021-10-02 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)
[She nods.]

I think this time we should brave the clown-themed 'fast food restaurant'. There's nothing the other way but a landslide.
leaveofabsence: ([FA] 67)

1/2

[personal profile] leaveofabsence 2021-10-02 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Clowned theme...
leaveofabsence: peerspie @ tumblr ([RI21] each item just waiting)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] leaveofabsence 2021-10-02 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Never mind, that is not important right now. Shall we be off?
scattershot: (✶ weight of a whisper)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] scattershot 2021-10-02 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Let's. And I don't doubt you were planning on it already, but let's at least try to stay together.
leaveofabsence: <user name="pragmatism"> ([RI30] "I'm just rather taken)

Re: ABANDONED MINES

[personal profile] leaveofabsence 2021-10-02 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm glad we're of the same line of thinking.