Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2022-04-09 03:54 pm
Entry tags:

HEARTFORGE - sensitIV (Session 4)

You are in the heart of a massive forge. In front of you are tools, and your objective is clear - to use them to channel the strength of your heart and create.

What are you creating? Who can say. Only you - and only you'll know if - and when, it's good enough. The stories before you are not yours right now, but you'll make them yours soon enough.

And you will survive.
proceedwithcautus: (was that the wrong pill to take)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2022-04-10 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
[ listen she's going to read that story and then like

glance at lucifel. like, also at everyone, but also at lucifel. ]

...hm.

At least we're practiced.
sancrimony: (☨ 099)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2022-04-10 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
[ smiles ]
proceedwithcautus: (it comes with a price)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2022-04-10 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
I think this host is trying to bully you...
sancrimony: (🕂 195)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2022-04-10 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
How kind of them to give me such attention.
proceedwithcautus: (i must become)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2022-04-10 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose we should give them a good response, then.
sancrimony: (🕈 236)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2022-04-10 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose so.

[ . . .

sighs. to the rest of the unit: ]

How shall we do this? Obviously, I have plenty of ammunition for this sort of story—if you all would like to reserve your own resources for the next round, then I can handle this.

Of course, there are six things to provide, and we have six people, so naturally we can divide the workload up as well, if we'd like.
forgottenmercy: (what understanding defies)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forgottenmercy 2022-04-10 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
I think we should, ah, divide it up, if possible. I, too, have much for this as well.
sancrimony: (☦ 091)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2022-04-10 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
Then . . . shall we pick straws on who does what?

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forgottenmercy - 2022-04-10 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2022-04-10 02:06 (UTC) - Expand
bondsofsuffering: ([Look] the theory of surrender)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] bondsofsuffering 2022-04-10 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
We might as well split them all up. What kinds of emotions or memories do we want for each slot?
sancrimony: (🕂 180)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2022-04-10 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
[ bitterness says random ]

I think that question should be best left for others to answer.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] bondsofsuffering - 2022-04-10 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2022-04-10 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] bondsofsuffering - 2022-04-10 01:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2022-04-10 02:08 (UTC) - Expand
outofoffice: (67)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] outofoffice 2022-04-10 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
I also have quite a bit of suitable material.

And--

[ hm ]

--No objections to sharing it, as preserving these stories is a storyteller's whole purpose.
sancrimony: (☨ 111)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2022-04-10 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
[ —pauses, the bitter sort of DESIRE FOR RANDOM CHAOS TO MAKE A SHITTY NONSENSICAL STORY dying down in the face of genuine curiosity ]

. . . In your opinion, as a storyteller, is even a nonsensical, incoherent story one worth preserving?
Edited 2022-04-10 01:48 (UTC)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] outofoffice - 2022-04-10 01:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2022-04-10 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] outofoffice - 2022-04-10 02:37 (UTC) - Expand
proceedwithcautus: (who could be so cold?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2022-04-10 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Sir, you shouldn't take this on all on your own!

After all, I think we all have things that could suit, and many hands make light work.
sancrimony: (☨ 141)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony 2022-04-10 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
Ah—it wasn't a real suggestion. I know how this unit is.

[ it would have been a real suggestion if this unit didn't operate the way it did but ]

That is the wiser choice.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus - 2022-04-10 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2022-04-10 02:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus - 2022-04-10 02:24 (UTC) - Expand
shatteredhourglass: (〇21)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] shatteredhourglass 2022-04-10 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
I'd rather split it up. But I'm not sure what we would be putting in... it sounded like it could just be anything.

[Too much freedom is suffering.]

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2022-04-10 01:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] shatteredhourglass - 2022-04-10 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2022-04-10 01:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] shatteredhourglass - 2022-04-10 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] sancrimony - 2022-04-10 02:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] shatteredhourglass - 2022-04-10 02:15 (UTC) - Expand
outofoffice: (365)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] outofoffice 2022-04-10 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
If not for being inside the dorms, I would worry we gave them ideas.
proceedwithcautus: (the culmination of man's mistakes)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2022-04-10 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
Even if they did, though, we're prepared to win at this.

And I think we should, as repayment for some of the emotional damages happening right now.
outofoffice: (475)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] outofoffice 2022-04-10 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
[ Looks at Lucifel

Looks at a camera

, ]


Nonsense, I'm sure we're all fine!
proceedwithcautus: (full disclosure)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2022-04-10 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
Ehe.

Well, we should show them how incredibly fine we are, I suppose.
outofoffice: (14)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] outofoffice 2022-04-10 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
Writing a story can't be harder than mixing a drink -- we'll ace this for sure!
proceedwithcautus: (pic#15360290)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2022-04-10 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
If we work together, it should be pretty easy.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] outofoffice - 2022-04-10 02:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus - 2022-04-10 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] outofoffice - 2022-04-10 02:26 (UTC) - Expand
shatteredhourglass: (〇23)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] shatteredhourglass 2022-04-10 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
[Looks over at Lucifel.

Looks back at Eirene.]


At least there's that. ...I wonder if they'll let us "share" things for free again.
proceedwithcautus: (it's not enough.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2022-04-10 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
I think so, so let's see what we can get back from it...
shatteredhourglass: (〇23)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] shatteredhourglass 2022-04-10 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
It sounds like they put a limit on it this time... stingy. Mm, I guess if it's left up to us, we can just put in whatever we want?
proceedwithcautus: (if you will believe in your heart)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] proceedwithcautus 2022-04-10 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
It seems like it! So, whatever feels like an appropriate way to respond.