Imeeji Idol Productions ([personal profile] idolpro) wrote2019-11-22 12:18 pm
Entry tags:

GM Game: LiliS

[ The door shuts behind you, leaving you in a copy of this room. Upon one of the fancy tables is your card for the round, along with slots for each unit for you to go slide in your choices.

You can come and go as you will, but once you have left the room, you cannot speak of anything that transpires within: not your choices, not your discussion, not your alliances.

Do your best, idol-tachi. ]
letgrow: (where reality has long been forgotten)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-29 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
For teams...I’d like to suggest 10iv and Hss. As well as one of the low cards on Sensitiv.
theyregooddogs: (from you the wings of)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] theyregooddogs 2019-11-29 05:07 am (UTC)(link)
Why those units?
letgrow: (You'd be shocked at the state of things)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-29 06:17 am (UTC)(link)
Hss and Sensitiv have both stayed fairly consistently high on points and 10iv always bounces back every other round, which there would be one more round after this for them to bounce back. As far as I know, none of them have many if any close ties to us so they might be likely to hit us.

So if they do hit us, it blocks, and if they don’t hit us, we aren’t beating someone who is already down. Plus the cards we’ll be playing are low-ish.
theyregooddogs: (and there、woman of love)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] theyregooddogs 2019-11-29 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't like that you want to put pressure on another unit to do something for bigger points . . . That aside, sounds reasonable enough.
letgrow: (And I have to tell you something)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-29 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't particularly want to, but....that seems to be the game.

Ah, I'm open to suggestions too?
theyregooddogs: (of my longing)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] theyregooddogs 2019-11-30 05:26 am (UTC)(link)
Mm, no, doesn't matter. Feels off, but I can't pin down what I'm missing in this picture.
letgrow: (I believe her I believe her I believe he)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-30 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
[....taps her chin, thinking]

Something about the unit choices? Or the cards?
theyregooddogs: (how tensed and avid.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] theyregooddogs 2019-11-30 05:35 am (UTC)(link)
No, the amount of cards. You're really nervous, going after that many people at once. It'll push us high up in points if two of them go through when we're already sitting on a lot of points.

Think you should block from whoever you think poses the greatest threat, leave the other two alone.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow - 2019-11-30 06:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] worthathousand - 2019-11-30 16:47 (UTC) - Expand
worthathousand: (❦ so I turned back to breathing)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] worthathousand 2019-11-30 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Though their score is high, I am actually a bit concerned about striking Heart Soldier. They are only just recovering from the out of game murder of their youngest.

And I presume that the high-scoring units have been attractive targets to everyone—especially since you just mention “bouncing back” as part of the pattern.
letgrow: (Both in equal parts)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-30 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Hss has stayed over 39 points all game despite being an attractive target all game.

So either they’re not as attractive a target as us or they’re playing very hard.
worthathousand: (you and I'll be safe and sound ❦)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] worthathousand 2019-12-01 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
Hm.
[ a touch of an unhappy frown, but she nods ]

It sounds as if you've been doing a lot to manage our points, and that it's been working; I don't want to undermine that. I might simply request that we avoid inflicting them with depression, if that's being considered.
endurism: (cardboard bird shoes 👍)

[personal profile] endurism 2019-11-29 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)
We have a convenient set of cards this round... so that should be fine. None of the low ones will cause too much harm.
letgrow: (And I have to tell you something)

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-29 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Mm, I'm really grateful for our hand this round.
endurism: (sumsabitches always find the yarn.)

[personal profile] endurism 2019-11-29 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Indeed... the only thing I feel we have to be wary about now is racking up too many points and inviting more retribution.
letgrow: (I believe her I believe her I believe he)

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-29 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I hope we're correctly guessing at least two blocks....
endurism: (I like when the mouth foreskin peels bac)

[personal profile] endurism 2019-11-29 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
That would probably be best at this point, but... not knowing who has targeted us previously does make predicting that difficult.
letgrow: (As naked as a trout)

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-29 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Mm, it's all basically just....assumptions.
endurism: (gifsthatendtoosoon)

[personal profile] endurism 2019-11-29 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, well. That's no different from the other rounds, and so far, our guesses and assumptions have been fair.

There's no reason to think things will go terribly wrong now, of all times.

(no subject)

[personal profile] letgrow - 2019-11-29 23:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] endurism - 2019-11-29 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] letgrow - 2019-11-30 04:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] endurism - 2019-11-30 15:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] letgrow - 2019-11-30 19:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] endurism - 2019-11-30 21:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] letgrow - 2019-11-30 21:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] endurism - 2019-11-30 21:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] letgrow - 2019-11-30 21:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] endurism - 2019-11-30 21:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] letgrow - 2019-11-30 22:00 (UTC) - Expand
starvingvenemydragon: (16)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] starvingvenemydragon 2019-11-29 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
No objections.

[Please pretend he didn't miss a round battling a monster headache+complaints from the other voices in his head.]
letgrow: (Both in equal parts)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-29 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Mm. If you have any suggestions, of course I'll be happy to hear them. I think....I think it's pretty sound though?
starvingvenemydragon: (4)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] starvingvenemydragon 2019-11-29 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, your strategy is fine. If I had to reach for suggestions... maybe don't play "heavy fatigue" on sensitIV? I suspect they have enough of that already.
letgrow: (You'd be shocked at the state of things)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-29 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I can imagine.... Mmm...conbini then?
starvingvenemydragon: (2)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] starvingvenemydragon 2019-11-29 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
That's fine with me.
letgrow: (where reality has long been forgotten)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow 2019-11-30 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
[Nods]

Mm, Got it.
starvingvenemydragon: (16)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] starvingvenemydragon 2019-11-30 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
...Thank you for putting forth your ideas. You're doing a very good job of staying cool.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] letgrow - 2019-11-30 23:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] starvingvenemydragon - 2019-11-30 23:46 (UTC) - Expand