GM Game: LiliS

[idolpro]

[ The door shuts behind you, leaving you in a copy of this room. Upon one of the fancy tables is your card for the round, along with slots for each unit for you to go slide in your choices.

You can come and go as you will, but once you have left the room, you cannot speak of anything that transpires within: not your choices, not your discussion, not your alliances.

Do your best, idol-tachi. ]

Comments

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

[Steels herself, looking around at everyone]

4, 4 and 7?

Re: DISCUSSION

[theyregooddogs]

Why? We already have enough points . . .

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

We could do 4, 4 and 2? I'd like to aim to block and plan for at least 9 points of damage. The new average.

Re: DISCUSSION

[theyregooddogs]

No, it's— Never mind, it doesn't matter.

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

....I want to hear it anyways.

Re: DISCUSSION

[theyregooddogs]

We're trying to win, aren't we? Why? We're not that bad off. And having points this high makes us more of a target, especially when everyone went down so quickly.

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

I'm not trying to win. I'm just...trying to make sure LiliS survives.

This is the last round. So if everyone is going to hit us high this round....there won't be another round to recover.

We could play 4 4 2? More opportunities to block?

Re: DISCUSSION

[theyregooddogs]

So, block. You called two of those right before.

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

Mm....all right.

Re: DISCUSSION

[clearwingfastdragon]

Fine with me, uhhh... we can play on Taisho Roman Revolution, future is now, and ☆ZRAEL, right? None of them except FiN are doing too hot this round, though.

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

Ah...the ones over forty are BAD END=DEAD END, FIN, Wild City, HSS and Alcheme.

We can't hit Bad End. I don't like the idea of hitting Wild City while John doesn't have his memory. We hit HSS last round. And I'd prefer not to hit Alcheme. We can use a baby card if we have to, but I sincerely don't think Alcheme would try to hit us? So it would be a waste of a block.

Re: DISCUSSION

[clearwingfastdragon]

I guess maybe we can hit someone who's in the 20s or 30s with a 1 or 2 just to try and block, and use a mid~high card on future is now. future is now might get ganged up on, though, so not too high?

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

The new average for points we get hit with is 9. If we play 1, 2, 7 we should be safe? Or we could play 4, 4, 2?

Re: DISCUSSION

[clearwingfastdragon]

Think I'd rather go for 4, 4, 2 just in case, since we don't want anybody going under 0. Our 4 cards aren't so bad, anyways.

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

Nn, our four cards are comparatively light, I think.

Re: DISCUSSION

[clearwingfastdragon]

Right. So I'd be fine with 4-4-2 at... future is now, Taisho Roman Revolution, ☆ZRAEL? Those two are both off our list and in the 20s.

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

John....says he's fine playing a card against Wild City.

Re: DISCUSSION

[clearwingfastdragon]

Wild City 'stead of ☆ZRAEL? Since ☆ZRAEL's lower.

Re: DISCUSSION

[theyregooddogs]

What do I have to do with them?

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

Ah, Wild City was your original team.

Re: DISCUSSION

[theyregooddogs]

They can handle one of the fours, whatever they are.

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

Are you sure? I don't feel right about asking it of you when you don't remember anything... And high number teams are likely to get piled on...

Re: DISCUSSION

[theyregooddogs]

Then, they won't even notice it. Besides, none of the high scores have dropped to zero or below.

Re: DISCUSSION

[letgrow]

If you're sure then...

Re: DISCUSSION

[theyregooddogs]

As sure as I am about anything right now.

[which means super unsure but it's fine]